天津外研版八年级下Module 9 Friendship 听力检测（含答案和听力音频及原文）考试试卷

天津外研版八年级下Module 9 Friendship 听力检测（含答案和听力音频及原文）考试试卷正在持续更新，目前2026百师联盟答案网为大家整理了相关试题及答案，供大家查缺补漏，高效提升成绩。

30.Which of the following views would John Blumenthal agreA.Instant Message chatters are childish.B.Men fever use emoticons.C.It's enough to use language in digital communicatlonl.D.There is an emoticon gene in everybody.31.From the text,we can conclude that the authorA.feels he has no difficulty using emoticonsB.thinks emoticons don't suit himC.encourage his friends to use emoticonsD.believes that emotico are suitable forryoOn average,we each eat more than 20 kilograms of fish per year.Worldwide,between 1961 andD2016.fish consumption increased faster than meat consumption,and grew twice as fast as the humarllome sh stck opoint wherehrd offisskeedishn has negativ impcnoodthe oyand polutesheth ishing waste.Temporary fishing bans mayhelp,but what if we ban fishing altogether?One thing is for sure:Then ould hopefully become a better place for marine species.Recentyears have seen plasticprodutsuc ued as the public has woken up to the ffectsofmarine plastics.But few peope ealizthe conribution that fishing makes.Pieces of abandonedfishing tools account for about 1 pereent of all marine itter,and according to a 201 study,percent of the big pieces of plastics floated in theGreat Pacific Garbage Patch"Without fishing,we'd also wipe out emissions from fishing boats.One study claimed that fishing industry wasactually highly fuel-consuming.like lobsters,with some boats using 20,000 liters of fuel to catch asingle ton.However,what we must not forget is that our planet is highly dependent on fishing in variousways.Around the world,40 million people earn their living directly from catching wild fish,whileanother 19 million are employed in relevant industries.A total ban on fishing would make it hard forthem to put food in their families'mouths.Moreover,seafood is a major source of protein acrossSoutheast Asia and islands in the Indian and Pacific Oceans.So while in Europe or the U.S.peoplecould eat more meat or soy products to make up for lost protein,there could be food shortage incommunities with little land-based farming.Though not a realistic choice,a total fishing ban is an interesting thought experiment,whichmay throw light on how man can get along with marine species.After all,the damage fishing does tothe entire ecosystem and the pollution it brings about are becoming so enormous that it is time wedid something to change it.32.Why would the ocean become a better place if we banned fishing altogether?A.TheGreat Pacific Garbage Patch"would disappear.B.There would be less pollution to the ocean.C.Lobster fishing boats would consume less fuel.D.People would realize the effects of using plastics.33.What could happen to humans if fishing were competely banned?A.ome okers would have tofind jobs in fishing-relevant industes.B.Some would change their diet and eat less meat.C.omeostang lad-based farming.D Some would suffer from a lack of food.英语第5页共8页